Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A)

Advanced Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) to Enhance IVF Success

The journey to parenthood is often filled with hope, anticipation, and occasionally, uncertainty. For those undergoing fertility treatment, specifically In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF), the goal is not just to achieve a pregnancy but to bring home a healthy baby. One of the most significant advancements in reproductive medicine designed to improve these outcomes is PGT-A, formerly known as PGS. By analyzing the genetic makeup of an embryo before transfer, we may improve implantation selection and increase the chance of pregnancy per transfer in selected patient groups.
This comprehensive guide serves as an essential resource for understanding PGT-A testing. It explores the science behind genetic testing for aneuploidy, the benefits of selecting euploid embryos, and the realistic considerations regarding risks and success rates. Whether you are experiencing recurrent miscarriage, are of advanced maternal age, or simply wish to maximize your chances in a single cycle, understanding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is a vital step in your decision-making process. Read on to discover how this technology acts as a powerful selection tool in modern IVF laboratories.

What exactly is PGT-A testing and how does it fit into fertility treatment?

PGT-A stands for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. It is a sophisticated screening process performed on embryos created during IVF treatment to verify that they contain the correct number of chromosomes. A typical human cell contains 46 chromosomes (23 pairs). An embryo with this correct number is termed "euploid" and has the highest likelihood of implantation and live birth among available embryos, although success is still influenced by maternal and uterine factors. Conversely, an embryo with missing or extra chromosomes is termed "aneuploid."

Key Informations About PGT-A

It screens IVF embryos for chromosome number
46 chromosome euploid embryos has the highest live birth among available embryos
It is not a treatment tool that changes the embryo, but a selection tool identifies the healthy embryos
It can reduce miscarriage risk from chromosome errors
Helps for a healthy and safe live birth
In the context of fertility treatment, PGT-A is not a treatment that changes the embryo; rather, it is a selection tool. By identifying which embryos are chromosomally normal, embryologists and clinicians can prioritize the healthy embryos for transfer. This helps avoid the emotional and physical toll of transferring an embryo that is unlikely to implant or may result in miscarriage due to chromosomal abnormality. The integration of preimplantation genetic testing into an IVF cycle transforms the process from a morphological assessment (looking at the shape and cells under a microscope) to a genetic assessment.
Using PGT-A testing allows for the strategy of single embryo transfer with greater confidence. Historically, multiple embryos might be transferred to increase success rates, but this increases the risk of multiple pregnancies (twins or triplets), which carry higher obstetric risks. With PGT-A, the focus shifts to quality over quantity. By ensuring the genetic health of the embryo, patients can achieve high pregnancy rates while minimizing the risks associated with multiple births. This aligns the technological capabilities of the laboratory with the ultimate goal of a healthy live birth.

How is the biopsy performed and is it safe for the blastocyst?

The process of PGT-A involves a delicate procedure known as an embryo biopsy. This is typically performed when the embryo reaches the blastocyst stage, which usually occurs on day five or six after fertilisation. At this stage, the embryo has differentiated into two distinct cell types: the inner cell mass (which becomes the fetus) and the trophectoderm (which becomes the placenta). The biopsy carefully removes roughly 5 to 10 cells from the trophectoderm layer, ensuring that the inner cell mass remains untouched and intact.

Safety is a primary concern for any patient. Because the cells are taken from the future placenta and not the fetus itself, the risk of clinically significant damage to the embryo is considered low when performed by experienced laboratories. Once the cells are removed, the embryos are frozen (vitrified) to await the results of the biopsy, while the cell sample is sent to a genetics laboratory for analysis. The modern freezing techniques used today verify that survival rates for these embryos are exceptionally high, maintaining their viability for future transfer cycles.

However, it is important to acknowledge that not every embryo is suitable for biopsy. An embryo must reach the blastocyst stage and be of sufficient quality to withstand the procedure. If an embryo is developing slowly or has poor cellular structure, the embryologist may advise against the biopsy to avoid compromising its potential. Therefore, the number of embryos available for testing depends heavily on the initial response to stimulation and the development of the embryos in culture. This step requires high-precision equipment and skilled practitioners to ensure the embryo remains safe throughout the process.

What does it mean if an embryo is aneuploid or has the wrong number of chromosomes?

When the results of the genetic analysis arrive, they may indicate that an embryo is aneuploid. This means the cells tested had an abnormalnumber of chromosomes. Aneuploidy is the most common cause of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. As women age, the quality of their eggs declines, leading to a higher frequency of errors during cell division. This results in a higher proportion of embryos with chromosomal issues, such as Down’s syndrome (Trisomy 21), or other non-viable conditions.
An aneuploid result essentially explains why a morphologically "good-looking" embryo might fail to generate a pregnancy. Under a microscope, an embryo can appear to be top-quality, but genetically, it may carry errors that prevent it from developing. Chromosomal abnormalities are naturally occurring events and are not typically caused by the IVF process itself but rather stem from the egg or sperm source. Identifying these abnormalities prevents the transfer of an embryo that would almost certainly result in a negative outcome or a miscarriage.
It is crucial to understand that most aneuploid embryos do not result in a viable ongoing pregnancy or healthy live birth. In most cases, nature has a screening mechanism where these embryos either do not implant or stop developing very early. However, some can implant and lead to a clinical miscarriage, which is a traumatic event for patients. By filtering out these embryos through genetic screening, PGT-A spares patients from the time, cost, and heartache associated with transferring embryos that have no chance of survival.

Who stands to benefit most from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy?

While PGT-A is a powerful tool, it is often recommended for specific groups of patients where the yield of abnormal embryos is expected to be higher. One of the primary indications is advanced maternal age. Women over the age of 35, and particularly those over 38, experience a sharp increase in the rate of aneuploidy in their eggs. For a woman over 40, more than half of the embryos created may be chromosomally abnormal. In these cases, PGT-A effectively improves the efficiency of the cycle by identifying the few normal embryos available.

Groups With Aneuploidy Risk

Advanced maternal age increases aneuploidy rates
For woman over 40, most embryos may be abnormal
PGT-A helps identify normal embryos faster

PGT-A Impoves Outcomes

Recurrent miscarriage patients may benefit
Patients with repeated implantation failures may benefit
Severe male factor infertility may benefit from this testing
Testing may reduce time to pregnancy
Another group that benefits significantly includes patients with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. If a patient has experienced multiple miscarriages, it is often due to recurring chromosomal errors. PGT-A can determine if the losses are due to the embryo quality. Similarly, patients who have experienced repeated implantation failure (several failed IVF transfers with good-quality embryos) may use PGT-A to ensure that future transfers utilize only euploid embryos. This helps rule out the embryo as the cause of failure and allows the doctor to investigate other factors, such as the uterine environment.
Additionally, couples with severe male factor infertility or those who carry balanced translocations (a structural chromosomal rearrangement) may benefit from this testing. For couples carrying structural rearrangements, a specialized form of testing (PGT-SR) is used, often in conjunction with aneuploidy screening. Ultimately, anyone wishing to minimize the time to pregnancy by ensuring that each embryo transfer has the highest possible theoretical chance of success might consider pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

How does PGT-A reduce the chances of miscarriage and improve time to pregnancy?

The correlation between chromosomal abnormalities and miscarriage is well-established. By ensuring that only a chromosomally normal embryo is transferred, PGT-A may reduce miscarriage risk, particularly in patients of advanced maternal age or with recurrent pregnancy loss. While it cannot eliminate the risk entirely (as other factors like uterine health and hormonal support play a role), it removes the single largest variable causing early pregnancy loss. For patients who have suffered previous losses, this risk reduction is often the primary motivation for using PGT-A.

Time to pregnancy is a critical metric in fertility treatment. In a standard IVF cycle without testing, a patient might transfer embryos sequentially based on visual grading. If the best-looking embryo is genetically abnormal, the patient undergoes a transfer, waits two weeks for a test, potentially experiences a miscarriage, and then waits weeks or months for the cycle to resolve before trying again. This process can take months. With PGT-A, the abnormal embryos are identified before transfer. The patient goes directly to transferring a euploid embryo, thereby shortening the timeline to a successful pregnancy.

Furthermore, PGT-A supports the practice of elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Because the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo is higher for tested euploid embryos, there is less pressure to transfer two embryos to get a positive result. This leads to safer, singleton pregnancies. The efficiency gained means that fewer transfers are needed to achieve a live birth, which can also have financial benefits by reducing the costs associated with failed transfers and subsequent medical care for miscarriages.

What are mosaic embryos and can they result in a healthy baby?

One of the complexities of PGT-A is the diagnosis of mosaicism. A result is reported as mosaic when the biopsy sample contains a mixture of both euploid and aneuploid cells. In the past, these embryos might have been discarded as abnormal. However, recent research suggests that mosaic embryos may still result in healthy live birth outcomes, although implantation rates are lower and miscarriage risk is higher compared with euploid embryos. This has led to nuanced guidelines regarding the transfer of a mosaic embryo.

About Mosaic Embryos

Mixture of both euploid and aneuploid cells
Implemantation rates are lower and miscarriage risk is higher compared to eploid
Considered as a second-tier option when no normal embryos are available
Levels of mosaicism and specific chromosomes involved influence the recommendation
They may have a lower chance of success but they are not non-viable and it is a possible opportunity for patients
Mosaic embryos may result in a healthy live birth, although they generally have a lower implantation rate and a higher miscarriage rate compared to fully euploid embryos. The decision to transfer a mosaic embryo is complex and requires detailed genetic counseling. It is often considered a second-tier option when no fully normal embryos are available. The level of mosaicism (low-level vs. high-level) and the specific chromosomes involved influence the recommendation.
It is vital for patients to understand that a mosaic result is not a definitive "no." It represents a gray area in biological development. Embryos may have a lower chance of success if they are mosaic, but they are not necessarily non-viable. Clinics now have specific protocols for prioritizing these embryos, ensuring that patients have every possible opportunity for a baby while being fully informed of the potential risks. This evolving area of science highlights the importance of expert interpretation of genetic information.

Are there specific risks of PGT-A or downsides to the testing process?

A significant concern is the potential for discarding viable embryos. Because the biopsy takes cells from the trophectoderm (placenta) and not the inner cell mass (fetus), there is a theoretical discordance. A genetic screening result might suggest the placenta cells are abnormal while the fetus is normal. While PGT-A is highly accurate, it is not 100 percent perfect. This leads to the concern that using PGT-A may decrease the cumulative pregnancy rate if an embryo that could have resulted in a baby is categorized as abnormal and discarded.
Ultrasound guidance has become the gold standard for this procedure. In the past, "clinical touch" was used, where doctors relied on feeling the resistance of the uterus. However, studies have consistently shown that using abdominal ultrasound to visualize the tip of the catheter improves pregnancy rates. It eliminates guesswork. The doctor can see exactly where the catheter is relative to the uterine floor and walls. This visual feedback allows for real-time adjustments. If the angle of the cervix is sharp, the doctor can manipulate the speculum or adjust the bladder fill to correct the path before the delicate inner catheter is advanced.
Furthermore, PGT-A is an additional cost on top of the standard IVF treatment. It requires fewer embryos to be available for transfer because the abnormal ones are filtered out. For patients with very low ovarian reserve who produce only one or two embryos, the attrition rate might mean reaching the transfer stage becomes difficult. In such cases, the fear of having no embryos available for transfer after testing is a valid emotional hurdle. Patients must weigh the desire for information against the possibility of a cycle ending without a transfer.

How does the HFEA view "add-on" treatments like genetic screening?

The HFEA (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority) in the UK regulates fertility treatments and classifies PGT-A as a treatment "add-on." An add-on is defined as an optional extra that may be offered on top of routine fertility treatments. The HFEA utilizes a "traffic light" system to rate the evidence supporting these add-ons. Currently, the classification for PGT-A acknowledges its utility in specific patient groups but advises that it may not be beneficial for all patients indiscriminately.
HFEA classifies PGT-A as a treatment "add-on"
Add-ons are optional extras beyond routine IVF
PGT-A acknowledges its utility in specific patient groups but may not be beneficial for all
It is efficient, reduces miscarriage and time to pregnancy but not a guarantee
Clinics need to provide transparent information about PGT-A
Patients should discuss suitability with their provider
The label of add-on implies that while there is evidence for its efficacy, particularly in reducing miscarriage rates and time to pregnancy for older women, it is not a guarantee of a baby. The HFEA emphasizes the need for clinics to provide transparent information regarding the chance of having a baby with and without the test. They aim to protect patients from unnecessary costs if the medical indication for the test is weak.
It is important to note that "add-on" status does not mean the treatment is ineffective. It means that the evidence base is still evolving to define exactly which patient populations see a statistically significant increase in live birth rates. For many specialists, the biological rationale for screening embryos to avoid transferring aneuploid ones is sound, particularly given the high rates of abnormality in human reproduction. Patients should discuss the HFEA status and the specific clinical reasoning for their case with their provider.

Why might using PGT-A decrease the chance of having a baby for some patients?

This seems contradictory, but for certain patient groups, using PGT-A may decrease the overall chances of a live birth per cycle started. This is primarily a numbers game. In IVF, some embryos that test as “abnormal” or “mosaic” might have self-corrected or resulted in a healthy birth if transferred. By strictly discarding these, the pool of embryos available shrinks. For a young patient (under 35) with a good prognosis, the natural repair mechanisms of the embryo and the high baseline rate of euploidy might make the testing unnecessary or even detrimental if it leads to discarding a potentially viable embryo due to a false-positive or mosaic result.

Additionally, the stress on the embryo from the culture to the blastocyst stage, the biopsy, and the cryopreservation could, in theory, impact an embryo that is borderline in quality. While robust embryos survive well, fragile ones might not. If a patient produces very few embryos, the risk of cancelling a transfer because all embryos tested are abnormal can be higher than the chance of a transfer working.

Therefore, PGT-A is not a “one size fits all” solution. For younger women with no history of miscarriage, the increase in success rates per transfer might not justify the cost and the risk of reducing the total number of potentially viable embryos. It is a trade-off between the efficiency of the selection process and the cumulative potential of every egg retrieved. This is why personalized medical advice is crucial when deciding on PGT-A testing.

What is the difference between PGT-A, PGT-M, and PGT-SR?

While this page focuses on PGT-A, it is helpful to distinguish it from other forms of preimplantation genetic testing. PGT-A specifically looks for aneuploidy (random chromosomal errors). It screens for missing or extra chromosomes which occur spontaneously. It does not test for specific genetic diseases like Cystic Fibrosis or Huntington's disease.
PGT-M (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic/Single Gene Defects) is designed for couples who know they carry a specific genetic condition that they risk passing on to their child. In this process, the probe is built specifically for that family's mutation. PGT-SR (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Structural Rearrangements) is for people with chromosomal translocations or inversions.
PGT-A is often performed alongside PGT-M or PGT-SR. Once the embryos are screened for the specific genetic disease (M) or structural issue (SR), they are also checked for general chromosomal health (A). This ensures that an embryo free of the specific disease is not also accidentally aneuploid. Understanding these distinctions ensures that patients are asking for the correct type of genetic screening based on their medical history.

Key Takeaways for Your Fertility Journey

PGT-A (formerly PGS) screens embryos for chromosomal abnormalities to identify those most likely to result in a healthy baby.
The process involves a biopsy of the trophectoderm at the blastocyst stage, meaning the fetus itself is not touched.
Euploid embryos (normal chromosome count) have the highest potential for implantation and the lowest risk of miscarriage.
Aneuploid embryos (abnormal chromosome count) are the leading cause of IVF failure and early pregnancy loss.
This technology is most beneficial for women over 35, those with recurrent pregnancy loss, or those experiencing repeated implantation failure.
Mosaic embryos contain a mix of normal and abnormal cells; some may still result in a healthy pregnancy and require expert counseling.
PGT-A reduces the time to pregnancy and supports single embryo transfer, reducing the risks associated with twins.
Risks include the potential for no results, accidental damage during biopsy (rare), or the discarding of mosaic embryos that might have been viable.
The HFEA classifies PGT-A as an add-on, highlighting the need for careful patient selection rather than universal application.
Using PGT-A does not guarantee a baby,butimproves embryo selection efficiency and may increase pregnancy rates per transfer in appropriately selected patients.
WhatsApp Image 2026-01-28 at 07.22.18 (1)

Prof. Dr. Birol Vural

Specialist in Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Endocrinology (IVF)

With nearly 30 years of clinical and academic expertise, Prof. Dr. Birol Vural is a distinguished leader in women’s health and reproductive medicine. A graduate of the prestigious Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, he is the visionary founder of the Kocaeli University IVF Center. Refining his expertise at world-renowned institutions—including the Sher Institute (New York, USA) and Brussels Free University (Belgium)—Prof. Vural integrates international standards with compassionate, personalized care.

Areas of Excellence

30 Years of Clinical Mastery
IVF & Fertility Pioneer
Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery
International Pedigree (USA & Europe)

Quick Appointment